The Interaction of Faith and the Basic Sciences

People have approached me in the last few months, troubled over my move from Andrews University in Michigan to Loma Linda University in California. They wonder how can I give up the Seminary setting, where my specialties are front-row and center and move to a health science university, where I have to, in effect, start all over. The implication is that I have taken a big step down and have given up my best chance to change the world. Some have even implied that the move is some sort of exile.

I certainly don’t see it that way. Loma Linda University is in an amazing position to change the world. For one thing, it has the only faith-based medical and dental programs in the United States. There are several Jesuit institutions that offer medical programs, but none of them includes religion in the curriculum. They are simply secular programs offered at faith-based universities. Loma Linda is a health-science university that builds faith and wholeness into every single degree and certificate program. In light of recent publicity suggesting that religion can have a positive effect on overall health, Loma Linda is well-positioned to be at the cutting edge of health care in the decades to come.

You may be aware that National Geographic recently identified the Loma Linda community as one of the three longest lived communities on earth, and the only one where longevity is not tied to an isolated and non-duplicatable culture (the other two communities were in isolated parts of Okinawa and Sicily, I believe). The Loma Linda lifestyle may be the world’s best hope for significant advances in longevity in the near future.

In light of the above, the opportunity to be in charge of the religion and humanities curricula of Loma Linda University (Dean of the School of Religion and Division of Humanities) was too good to pass up. I have the opportunity to work with health scientists to integrate the spiritual, emotional and mental sides of the human condition with the latest advances in physical and medical sciences. If the Loma Linda philosophy of wholeness has produced a community that lives ten years longer than the California average, there is something here that is well worth being a part of.

Let me share with you a discussion I chaired between faculty of religion and faculty in the basic sciences at our School of Medicine on January 4, 2008. If there is any aspect of a health science university that could be considered at the opposite end of the spectrum from religion, it would be the basic sciences, which are completely dependant on hard data and careful empirical research. What value could religion classes possibly have to a PhD program in the basic sciences?

We asked the professors in the basic sciences to share the goals and objectives of the program and how religion could contribute to the lives of aspiring scientists. Here are some of the things we came up with:

1) Help students understand that faith is not incompatible with the production of new knowledge. Science is not of dubious usefulness for faith. Rather, faith needs to understand. Religion is worthy of the same kind of intellectual rigor that we expect from scientists. And science can also be engaged in from the standpoint of service to God. One of the things Loma Linda University can contribute to the world is the concept of faith-based and faith-motivated science, something happening in no other educational institution. Is the idea of a faith-based equivalent to Stanford or MIT too big a stretch? I think not. Is the world today ready for such an institution? I think so.

2) Scientists need to know that the Bible is worthy of serious scientific study. Religion teachers can help them learn healthy ways to read texts and common fallacies about the Bible and its interpretation to avoid.

3) Religion classes in a science curriculum can create a safe and respectful environment where students can sort out their own convictions about faith and knowledge. Religion can help them discover the spiritual significance of their lives and develop a sense of God’s purpose in their scientific endeavors. Not all students come to class as spiritual people, but they are all trying to figure out the meaning of their lives.

4) Explore whether the study of science inevitably leads to a loss of faith. And if faith is lost what kind of faith is lost? Can such an occurrence be a blessing at times?

Don’t you wish you could have been listening in on the discussion that produced ideas like that? I was pumped to be part of such a fruitful and life-changing discussion, with many more to come.

So to my two or three fans out there, don’t cry for me. I am having the time of my life. And I promise you I won’t neglect the research and publishing agenda I have pursued for the last twenty years, and that has led to this web site. Stay tuned for some fresh studies on the Battle of Armageddon in the next month or two.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 1/18/2008 1:25 PM Kevin James wrote:
    If God calls, you go! I trust you felt the deep conviction of God's Spirit in your cross country move. I recently moved from the West to the Southeast, no easy task, and I did it because God clearly led that direction. I am thankful for your willingess to take a leap into another chapter of your labor for Christ. My prayers are with. The opportunity sounds exciting and worthy. Rightly understood faith and science do not contradict each other and rightly understood will not cause one to lose faith in God's Word, but strengthen it.

    I will look forward to your future postings and all the responses that will come. I find this site stimulating in spirit and mind.

    Kevin
    Reply to this
  • 1/22/2008 8:00 AM Rich Humpal, JD wrote:
    Yes, if God calls one must answer. Keep in mind that serious bible students should also look at science. It would be nice if science and the bible agreed with one another.
    Reply to this
  • 1/22/2008 2:41 PM Kevin James wrote:
    Science should not trouble a bible student. Science has it's place, but with God's call science is not consulted, at least I haven't in my experience. Or maybe I have missed your point. If so, than my apologies ahead of time.
    Reply to this
  • 3/9/2008 3:52 PM Jarrod J. Williamson, Ph.D. wrote:
    Jon:

    Have you spent much time reading Dr. JP Mooreland at Talbot Theological Seminary? Dr. Mooreland was once invited to La Sierra University when I was faculty there ('99) and spoke on the relationship btween faith and reason. He has got some of the clearest materialin this area that I have come across.

    If you have not spoken with Dr. Mooreland, I think you should make contact with him.
    Reply to this
  • 5/29/2009 2:57 AM John Quin wrote:
    I have been afflicted with a career in science and more recently have had to deal with the fact that I no longer believe in a literal interpretation of Genesis.
    When you refer to "faith based science" I have come to view this as an oxymoron. I intend no insult in this statement but rather make the distinction that I view science as an inert tool. Science seeks out NATURAL explanations for every phenomena and as such will not consider the supernatural. Many people who adopt ONLY science to form their world view inevitably become Atheists and it's not hard to see why. The mistake overlooked by these people is that they selectively choose science to form their world view and exclude any other influence.
    We may be talking about semantics when you refer to faith based science. If you are endorsing that people should have a balanced belief system then I would whole heartily agree.
    As an aside with respect to your article "The Final Deception" ( http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/end/ThreeFrogs.html )
    I think the basis for the deception of science vs faith is that people have been deceived into using ONLY science to form their world view. Science has served mankind well and people have used it as a replacement for God. Three hundred years ago if someone was sick they probably prayed to God for healing, nowadays the same person will utilise science based medicine and receive the miracle cure they would have once prayed for.
    Many places on the internet you will find Christians trying to argue with philosophers regarding the existence of God. When philosophers only use statements of logic in their reasoning yet again they will inevitably deduce that God's existence is illogical. When the Bible talks about the importance of Faith I have come to realise that it may have been just this distinction that God was talking about. Christians are to build their world view based on Faith, not science.
    I however do find it challenging when many Christians apply this principle of Faith vs science to defend a literal interpretation of Genesis. I feel that Christians are placing expectations on Genesis to be scientifically and historically accurate that were not intended by God.
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.